Megan Mcardle, a blogger for The Atlantic (which is owned by Atlantic Media, the same company that owns Nextgov), wonders why the federal government is so bad at information technology -- and by IT, she means building Web sites that are easy to navigate and make it easy to find information. She says Obama's new whitehouse.gov site is "smart looking," but "unfortunately, that sleekness has been achieved by tucking even more of that unsightly information out of the way, where it won't mar the vista."

Alyssa Rosenberg, who blogs for Government Executive in FedBlog, followed up defending the federal government's IT efforts:

If the National Security Agency, working with private companies, can create a top-secret digital channel for Obama's Blackberry, clearly government is capable of IT innovations and creativity, especially when a) security is involved and b) the president asks. The IT work that's gone into building telework programs, for example, has been extremely impressive: when 60 percent of an agency's headquarters staff can work away from home and not crash the network, that's a real accomplishment.

Government IT does suffer, but the programs typically are on a scale that makes IT projects at some of the largest corporations look like a high school project. They also often push technology to its limits, asking to do things that have never been done before (consider the Army's Future Combat Systems).

That said, most IT project management consultants and scholars -- including those at the Government Accountability Office -- say what is the biggest culprit for failed IT systems in the federal government is the inability to manage risk. The Census Bureau's effort to build handheld devices to collect data from households during the 2010 census is a prime example of not managing risk.

But that still doesn't answer the aesthetic and usefulness problem of government Web sites. Mcardle isn't the only one who has this complaint -- it is indeed vary difficult to find many government documents and the most sought after data agencies collect. That's the point Jerry Brito at George Mason University's Mercatus Center pointed out in his 2007 paper, "Hack, Mash, and Peer: Crowdsourcing Government Transparency." The paper would be good reading for the Obama administration before they get too far down their road of making government more transparent. I wrote a blog item about it here (some links are bad).

Latest Blog Posts